Know Your Panel

Know Your Panel

Monday, March 3, 2025

9:30 am San Juan—José V. Toledo Federal Building

6 arguments · Panel: Gelpí, Lipez, and Rikelman

Per the court’s argument calendar as of September 3, 2026. Panels and schedules can change—confirm with the clerk’s office.

Print All sittings

Also on this date: 9:30 am, Boston

6 of 6 cases decided · median 168 days from argument. The record of this sitting is complete.

The panel

This panel has sat together in 1 prior sitting in this site’s records, most recently March 2025.

Gustavo A. Gelpí

Biden · 2021 · 4 years on the bench

Full profile → RSS

Recent authored opinions

Recent arguments before this judge

Kermit V. Lipez Senior Judge

Clinton · 1998 · 28 years on the bench

Full profile → RSS

Recent authored opinions

Recent arguments before this judge

Julie Rikelman

Biden · 2023 · 3 years on the bench

Full profile → RSS

Recent authored opinions

Recent arguments before this judge

The docket—order of call

Case Docket Audio Decision
Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Inc. v. Worldnet Telecommunications, LLC Appellant: 15 min. Appellee: 15 min. 22-1127 Listen Oct 21, 2025 Vac’d
United States v. Derek Munoz-Gonzalez Appellant: 10 min. Appellee: 10 min. 22-1423 Listen Jul 17, 2025 Aff’d
Giovanni Irizarry Sierra v. Carolyn W. Colvin Appellant: 10 min. Appellee: 10 min. 22-1933 Listen Oct 27, 2025 Aff’d
Neyza Cruz-Cedeño, et al. v. Fernando Vega-Moral Appellants: 15 min. Appellee: 15 min. 23-1609 Listen Aug 8, 2025 Aff’d
United States v. Carlos Vázquez-Narvaez Appellant: 10 min. Appellee: 10 min. 23-1963 Listen Apr 9, 2025 Vac’d
United States v. Alexis D. Negrón-Cruz Appellant: 10 min. Appellee: 10 min. 23-1976 Listen Aug 28, 2025 Aff’d

A sitting is a day’s scheduled oral arguments before a single panel of the court. Calendar data follows the court’s published argument calendar (as of September 3, 2026); audio links are the court’s public recordings (index), typically posted the day of argument; decisions are joined from this site’s opinion database and reflect published dispositions only. Nothing here is legal advice or a prediction.